It Is What It Is
NEED TO KNOW
Follow WEEI.com football writer Christopher Price at twitter.com/cpriceNFL. In addition, get the latest WEEI.com updates at twitter.com/WEEI.
A WEEI.com Patriots Blog
WEEI.com Blog Network

Peter King on D&H: Roger Goodell never went back to Bill Belichick for explanation

02.04.11 at 2:45 pm ET
By   |   Comments

Sports Illustrated and NBC Sports NFL reporter Peter King joined the Dale & Holley show Friday morning to talk about the Super Bowl. (Listen to the interview at the Dale & Holley audio on demand page.) King also discussed some interesting comments that were in a profile piece he did this week on Roger Goodell, in which the commissioner talked about how disappointed and “deceived” he felt following Bill Belichick‘s stonewalling of the press after the Patriots’ Spygate punishment.

King was asked why Goodell did not go back to Belichick and tell him his performance before the media was not what the commissioner expected.

Said King: “I asked him, I said, ‘Did you go back to him and did you ever contact him about it?’ And he said, ‘No.” And I think his whole thing was, at that point ‘€” and I’m interpreting here ‘€” his whole thing was at that point, the wounds are wide and the wounds are ugly. To exacerbate the wounds at this point is not something I want to do.

“Now, I’ve heard from a lot of people, including a bunch of people in the media down here: Why is Goodell bringing this up now? I said, well, because this is Goodell’s life and career, and I’m cross-examining him on this stuff. ‘€¦ Obviously, I’m going to ask him in depth about the toughest decision he had to make in his professional career ‘€” Mike Vick and Spygate and [Ben] Roethlisberger and things like that.

“So, the short answer is I don’t know. But I did ask him if he went back and attempted to get Belichick to do it. And he said, ‘No.’ ”

King was asked if he was surprised that Goodell answered the Belichick question candidly and did not simply say, “We’ve moved on.”

Said King: “One of the reasons why I think he didn’t, and this is just my opinion: At the start of this story, I basically emphasized to him and the other people in the league office when I wanted to do this story that this couldn’t be sort of a press conference story. It can’t be a story that, in essence, he answers questions just very officially without any real depth and without any real color.

“At the end of it, I called him last Thursday and I said to him, ‘You know, I just wanted to thank you. I wanted to give you my appreciation for doing what you said you were going to do, in opening up about some things in your life.’ And he said to me, ‘Well, Peter, you know why I did it?’ And I said, ‘No.’ And he goes, ‘Because you told me if I did this that I wouldn’t have to do it again for the next 20 years.’ And he sort of laughed.

“Because in the beginning I said, ‘Look, I want to do this right. I want to do the ultimate Goodell profile. In some ways ‘€” and I told him this ‘€” when I wrote about Bill Belichick after the Patriots won their second Super Bowl, I said, ‘I wanted to do a story that if this is the last story that’s ever done about you in Sports Illustrated, I want it to be done right. I want to have a good part of your life in there, a good part of your background. And so, it was sort of the same way here. And again, he could have chosen to answer any question any way he wanted to answer it. But it struck me when he said what he said about Belichick that he’s been thinking it for a long time.”

King said he hopes people go beyond the headlines and read the article, which includes other interesting and original comments from Goodell and those affected by him. Said King: “I understand those [comments about Belichick and Roethlisberger] are two headlines that came out of what I reported this week. And I don’t fight that. I’m not upset with it in any way, shape or form. [But] I would be very disappointed if people didn’t take the time to read the story.”

Read More: Ben Roethlisberger, Bill Belichick, Peter King, roger goodell

Uncertainty around franchise tag could create confusion for Logan Mankins and Patriots

02.04.11 at 12:25 am ET
By   |   Comments

The fact that the NFL and the National Football League Players Association are disagreeing about the state of the franchise tag throws another wrinkle into the already complicated situation between the Patriots and Pro Bowl offensive lineman Logan Manikins.

Last week, a league spokesman indicated the franchise tags would remain status quo ‘€” that is, starting Feb. 10 and running until Feb. 24, clubs could continue to place the tag on players whose contracts are expiring, even if there is no new collective bargaining agreement in place. But on Thursday, the NFLPA indicated that if there is no new agreement in place between now and the day the old CBA expires ‘€” March 3 ‘€” such tags would be meaningless.

‘€œOur position is that you can franchise anyone you want, by whatever date you want, but if there is no CBA, the franchise tags will be meaningless,’€ NFL Players Association executive director DeMaurice Smith told reporters.

‘€œThe current CBA provides that ‘each club shall be permitted to designate one of its players who would otherwise be an Unrestricted Free Agent [or Restricted Free Agent] as a Franchise Player each season during the term of this Agreement,”€ Smith wrote in a memo to player agents, obtained by ProFootballTalk.com. ‘€œThe 2011 season is not a ‘season during the term of this Agreement’ so the NFL has no valid basis for claiming the right to franchise players in 2011.’€

In response, league spokesman Greg Aiello said via e-mail to The Associated Press: ‘€œWe are still operating under the current agreement. … Franchise tags are always made before the start of the next league year. This is consistent with past seasons.’€

In its current form, the franchise tag allows each team to prevent one of its players from becoming an unrestricted free agent by offering him a one-year contract that’s worth 120 percent of his salary from the season before, or the average of the five highest-paid players at his position, whichever is greater.

However, the players association isn’€™t thrilled about what the tag has become ‘€” in many ways they see it as a way to prevent players from reaching a big payday ‘€” and while it isn’€™t considered chief among the differences between the two sides, it has been a point of contention between the players and the owners in the past.

Mankins and the Patriots aren’€™t the only team facing uncertainty around the franchise tag, as several big-name players across the league are facing an uncertain future because of the franchise tag situation. Philadelphia’€™s Michael Vick, Indy’€™s Peyton Manning, Pittsburgh’€™s Lamarr Woodley and Baltimore’€™s Haloti Ngata are all candidates to be franchised under the old system, but could theoretically hit the open market if the tag is eliminated.
Read the rest of this entry »

Read More: Adam Vinatieri, Al Davis, De Maurice Smith, Frank Bauer

Player survey reveals Gillette Stadium is seventh-best artificual surface in NFL

02.03.11 at 8:26 pm ET
By   |   Comments

In a survey conducted by the National Football League Players Association, the Gillette Stadium playing surface was ranked seventh among the league’s 13 fields that are classified as “artificial infilled.” Among the non-grass surfaces, Gillette trailed Lucas Oil Stadium (first), New Meadowlands Stadium (second), Louisiana Superdome (third), Seattle’s Qwest Field (fourth), Cowboys Stadium (fifth) and the Georgia Dome (sixth). The survey also listed Gillette as the ninth-worst “artificial infilled” venue, with Minnesota’s Metrodome, Buffalo’s Ralph Wilson Stadium and the Edward Jones Dome in St. Louis leading the way.

Read More: Gillette Stadium, Patriots,

Patriots offensive line takes home ‘Madden’ award

02.03.11 at 7:29 pm ET
By   |   Comments

The Patriots offensive line was named the winners of the annual “Madden Most Valuable Protectors” award on Thursday. New England came out on top of a group of lines that included fellow finalists Kansas City, New York Giants, Atlanta and New Orleans, a collection that was chosen by John Madden. The winner was then chosen after fan voting on NFL.com. Dan Koppen, Dan Connolly and Mark LeVoir were on hand in Dallas to accept the award.

Read More: Dan Connolly, Dan Koppen, John Madden, mark levoir

NFL Draft’s Potential Patriots: Wisconsin OT Gabe Carimi

02.03.11 at 11:00 am ET
By   |   Comments

WEEI.com will continue to offer daily insight and analysis regarding options that may be available to the Patriots when it comes to the 2011 NFL draft.

Gabe Carimi

Position: Offensive tackle

School: Wisconsin

Height: 6-foot-7 1/8

Weight: 315 pounds

Achievements: Outland Trophy (2010), consensus All-American (2010), Big Ten Offensive Lineman of the Year (2010), First team All-Big Ten (media, 2009), Second team All-Big Ten (coaches, 2009), Academic All-Big Ten (2010, 2009, 2008, 2007).

What he brings: Carimi spent his days in Wisconsin at left tackle, but he is considered he top right tackle prospect in the draft. One of the tougher offensive linemen out there, the ‘€œmean streak’€ cliché is often used to describe Carimi. He has a crazy 83 2/8-inch wingspan, which was second best last week in Mobile. As noted above, the 22-year-old won received the Outland Trophy, awarded to the nations’€™ best lineman. The last four players to receive it all ended up being top-10 picks (Ndamukong Suh, Andre Smith, Glenn Dorsey, Joe Thomas), though Carimi figures to come off the board sometime around the mid-to-late first round.

Where the Patriots could get him: No. 17 or No. 28 Read the rest of this entry »

Read More: 2011 NFL Draft, Potential Patriots,

Jay Glazer on D&C: ‘It’s amazing how incredibly alike these two teams are’

02.03.11 at 10:07 am ET
By   |   Comments

Fox Sports NFL reporter Jay Glazer checked in with the Dennis & Callahan show Thursday from the Super Bowl in Dallas, which is being hit with sub-freezing temperatures again Thursday. To hear the interview, go to the Dennis & Callahan audio on demand page.

“You should not have a Super Bowl site where SPF is not involved,” Glazer joked.

Looking at the game, Glazer said it’s a tough one to choose. “This is the most evenly matched Super Bowl I can remember in years,” he said. “And all the players I’ve talked to ‘€” I’ve talked to players, coaches ‘€” they’re like, ‘Man, we can’t pick it.’

“If you look at these two teams, both quarterbacks are better at extending the play than any QB in this league besides Michael Vick. Basically, half the time, the play doesn’t really start until you hit those guys. Both receiving corps can gut you and gas you. Both defenses, very, very violent defenses, 3-4 defenses. Both offensive lines, they’ve been decimated at times by injuries. Both coaches, the coaches are ‘€” they’re the same guy. They’re grunts. They’re no-drama grunts. It’s amazing how incredibly alike these two teams are.”

Steelers quarterback Ben Roethlisberger insists he’s found religion and wants to be a role model following his much-publicized offseason problems. On Wednesday he reportedly was seen drinking and singing at a Dallas-area piano bar. Glazer said that shouldn’t matter. “He’s a grown man,” Glazer said. “Something like that doesn’t make you not a role model.”

Asked if Roethlisberger’s teammates, who previously offered little support for the hard-partying, obnoxious quarterback, believe he’s a different person, Glazer replied: “They think he’s trying. I’m not saying he’s changed or anything like that. But they think he’s trying. He’s trying with a bunch of people.”

Read More: Ben Roethlisberger, Jay Glazer,

Packers say their season started to turn around with loss to the Patriots

02.02.11 at 11:15 pm ET
By   |   Comments

When it came to the 2010 Packers, the turning point in their season came on the night of Dec. 19 at Gillette Stadium.

Green Bay was coming off an ugly loss to the Lions, a defeat that saw starting quarterback Aaron Rodgers get knocked out of the game with a concussion, his second of the season. The Packers also had several players limited in practice over the course of the week, a group that included linebacker Clay Matthews and cornerback Charles Woodson. Rodgers was ruled out late in the week, and an already struggling Green Bay team was given little chance at winning.

But even at less than their best ‘€” including a botched sequence late in the game that prevented them from what might have been an attempt at a game-winning touchdown ‘€” the Packers hung tough and nearly matched the Patriots. Without Rodgers, Green Bay pushed New England to the limit, but eventually fell 31-27, a loss that dropped them to 8-6 on the season.

In a game that will be remembered around New England as the night Dan Connolly delivered one of the most memorable kick returns in franchise history, for the Packers, the contest was a tribute to their depth. Green Bay ‘€” which eventually landed 16 players on injured reserve over the course of the season ‘€” got 251 yards passing from backup quarterback Matt Flynn, while other players also stepped up and made big plays at key times in the contest.

While the phrase ‘€œmoral victory’€ is tough for players to stomach when it comes to explaining away late-season losses, the defeat to the Patriots galvanized the Packers, and showed them what they were truly capable of. If they could go on the road and almost knock off New England with a backup quarterback, well, there’€™s no telling what they could accomplish.

‘€œYou don’€™t win games off of moral victories, but you can take a lot away from them. What we took from that game was we have a lot of guys who are going to step up and fight despite of who’€™s playing,’€ Green Bay wide receiver Greg Jennings said Wednesday when asked about the December loss to the Patriots. ‘€œThat is why we are here today ‘€” because of guys being able to step up and fill voids.
Read the rest of this entry »

Read More: aaron rodgers, Charles Woodson, Clay matthews, Greg Jennings
Latest on Twitter
Patriots Box Score
Patriots Schedule
Patriots Headlines
NFL Headlines
Tips & Feedback

Verify