It Is What It Is
NEED TO KNOW
Follow WEEI.com football writer Christopher Price at twitter.com/cpriceNFL. In addition, get the latest WEEI.com updates at twitter.com/WEEI.
A WEEI.com Patriots Blog
WEEI.com Blog Network
Five names to keep an eye on at No. 33 04.29.11 at 9:33 am ET
By

With the Patriots holding three picks in the second round (Nos. 33, 56 and 60) and two more in the third (Nos. 60 and 74), the Patriots have plenty of options on Friday. They’ll kick things off with the first pick of the second round, though Bill Belichick showed everyone Thursday that you can never count out the possibility of a trade.

This is an interesting situation for the Patriots. Generally a top pick in the second round can be flipped for a future first. With the Pats already possessing two first-rounders in 2012, would they actually consider going for another?

Assuming the Pats don’t move, here’s a quick look at names to consider with the 33rd pick.

Da’Quan Bowers, DE, Clemson

Bowers was the first overall pick in many early mock drafts, including ours, but knee issues have hurt his stock. Even if he’s healthy, he would not be a fit on the Patriots line given that he measures in at under 6-foot-4 and 280 pounds. He was a bit of a one-year wonder, but his one year (this past season) featured 15.5 sacks. He is one of the most talented pass-rushers in this draft, but system-wise is not a fit unless that Pats feel he can play outside linebacker.

Brooks Reed, DE, Arizona

Reed is a bit more logical of a choice than Bowers when it comes to the Patriots. He may not have as much upside, but he is a better fit as an outside linebacker in their scheme. His height (6-foot-2 4/8) might scare the Patriots away. Reed, 24, had seven sacks in his senior year.

As for a history lesson, the Patriots did a pretty good job in taking an undersized Arizona defensive end back in 1996 with Tedy Bruschi.

Brandon Harris, CB, Miami

The Patriots have spent a pick in the first two rounds on a cornerback in each of the last three years. Two of them (Devin McCourty and Darius Butler) are still with the team, while they ended the Terrence Wheatley era early. At 5-foot-9 and 193 pounds, Harris has the prototypical size of a Pats corner. Harris came out after his junior year, but given that he was a three-year starter, there are not experience issues.

“Every year my confidence rose,” he said at the combine. “I’m at the point right now that my confidence is so high and I believe in myself a ton.”

Torrey Smith, WR, Maryland

Smith is a major risk/reward pick. He could be great downfield threat or he could be the next Darrius Heyward-Bey. While Smith’s speed has led to comparisons to his former Maryland teammate, he doesn’t want anyone getting him confused with the former Raiders first-rounder.

“I feel like it’s ignorant for people to compare two completely different people,” he said at the combine. “Just because we went to the same school doesn’t mean anything. If he didn’t go to Maryland or I didn’t go to Maryland, we wouldn’t be having this conversation. At the end of the day, we’re two completely different people. I went on a completely different path than he did.”

Smith had 1,055 receiving yards and 12 touchdowns as a junior.

Ryan Williams, RB, Virginia Tech

Williams is another one-year wonder, and though he may be one of the more overrated players in the entire draft, he could be an option if the Pats decide to go with a running back. A sophomore, Williams has less mileage than the other backs in this draft, though he followed his 1,655-yard freshman year with an unproductive 477-yard sophomore campaign that was slowed by injury and decreased carries.

Read More: 2011 NFL Draft, Brandon Harris, Brooks Reed, Ryan Williams Print  |  Bark It Up!  |  Digg It
  • http://stevedakota.com dakota

    Greg Little update

    http://www.stevedakota.com/2011/04/greg-little-update-day-2-nfl-draft/

    It is widely noted my man crush for the PATS to draft Greg Little the WR out of UNC….so after the first round went by the board and 3 wr’s taken (AJ Green – Julio Jones- Jon Baldwin) I see about 3-6 wide-outs drafted in the 2nd round …

    The good news is ….he wont be one of the next 3 or 4 taken in round 2 unless one of the teams love Little like I do…. Thus if Im the PATS I can take him with the 28th pick (60th overall) in round 2 or their first pick in round 3 which is #10 (74th overall) — either way we have a great shot at getting a slot WR that with Brady throwing to him will haul in 50 plus catches a year and be great in

  • StuAndrews

    Watching the PATS never trade up and continuously trade down is BORING. WHy is it that the PATS are the only team that got booted in round 1 in the playoffs that TRADES DOWN…..year in and year out. How can you get the ELITE players if your constantly trading down. Are not the ELITE players chosen higher in the draft? Do we need to fill 100 positions or do we need to find some STUDS to fill a few positions? Bill is managing this like we are an expansion team.

  • RickterScale

    Do you want a team that is exciting on draft day, or a team competing for Super Bowls for 10 straight years?

  • Patsfanroach

    I do not care if it is boring. Seriously look at the Dynasty team. Here are the 1st round picks leading up to the SB run:
    92-Eugene Chung (gone by 2001)
    93-D. Bledsoe (on bench most of 2001 gone by 2003)
    94-Willie Mac (def part of the run)
    95-Ty Law (def part of the run)
    96-Terry Glenn (only played in 4 games in 2001 gone by 2003)
    97-Chris Canty (gone before 2001)
    98-Robert Edwards (gone after rookie year :o ( )
    99-Damien Woody (part of 2001-gone for 2003)
    -Andy Katzenmoyer (left team before 2001)
    00-No 1st round picks
    01-Richrd Seymour (STUD MAJOR PART OF DYNASTY)
    02-Daniel Graham (Def part of dynasty)
    03- T. Warren (on last SB team)

    So looking at this list the team was not built in the first round. It was later rounds 2nd and 3rd were huge and that 6th rounder named Brady might have been the best pick in the history of the NFL. Those who want the team to build in the 1st round need to look at this closely. Really on three or four of these 1st round guys were key to the dynasty. Relax and enjoy the ride. In Bill we trust!

  • TD

    Ask a team that tied up millions on a 1st round bust how that worked for them. You miss on a 2, you move on, it doesn’t destroy your cap for years.

    I’ll pass on the 1st round every year for 3 or 4 #2′s. Don’t tell me you can’t find good/great players after round 1, the NFL is drowning in them.

    Brady, Light, Koppen, Branch, Faulk, Gronk, Chung, Vollmer, Cassel, Samuel, Green, Givens, Bruschi and that’s just off the top of my head and just the recent Pats.

    7 Division titles, 4 AFC Championshis, 3 SB wins, and a 112-48 record! Remember what things were like before he got here? I do. Bill can trade down whenever the hell he wants as far as I’m concerned.

    Stop complaining and enjoy the ride!

  • Jim

    Sheard Hankerson Offensive Lineman in 3rd round I’d like to say Brooks but Sheard is a cold weather player

  • shack

    do you call one and done competing in the playoffs every year! i don”t no elite pass rusher same result one and done

  • Magnum PI

    People that say “In bill we trust” = morons

    As for the Pats…Cam Jordan would have been nice……

  • Justin

    So there are no elite players after the first round? Why waste time with rounds 2-7??? According to some of you, Brady was a waste, since the Pats didnt trade up and grab him in the first round, LMFAO. Hernandez and Gronkowski were terrible last year, because they werent first rounders. Sebastian Vollmer, complete waste of space, he wasnt drafted in round 1, right?

    Some of you need to relax, and let the Pats brain trust do what they think is best. You guys heard some tool on tv say that “Random Player” was a game changer, and thus you tihnk the Pats just NEED to move up and draft him. Remember, for every 1 of those cant miss players, you have 5 Ryan Leafs…

    I was a little disapointed that New England passed on a few of the available players, but to be honest, I always am. It is just the way it is. Why pay first round money for 2nd round talent, or 3rd talent, etc. That is the statement the Pats made last night. There are very few “elite” players in a draft, and the Pats havent been afraid of grabbing them when they see them (Seymour and Wilfork come to mind).

    I would much rather be disapointed on draft day, than to see another Laurence Maroney debacle. If the Pats had traded down and skipped on Maroney, all of you would have bitched about them trading down, lol

  • Patsfanroach

    Magnum. F OFF. Moron? For trusting in a coach that came here and brought this franchise (one of the worst in all sports before this decade) THREE Superbowl championships? Who is the moron here? Because you know more than one of the GREATEST COACHES IN THE HISTORY OF THE NFL? Yeah Jordan would have been “nice” no chit! They set themselves at the LT position and or the RT position for probably the REST OF BRADY’S CAREER here! Are you the same “moron” who hated the McCourty pick last year? Best corner in NE since Ty Law. Could be as good when it is all said and done.

    I do trust Bill. He has nothing but win here, I am guessing you are under 30 and do not remember the days of futility in the early 90′s? Or maybe a fair weather fan who only shows up for a winner? There was a reason we got Drew Bledsoe with the first pick…we had the worst team in the NFL. Bill. along with an amazing ownership team and let’s face it a hodge podge of assistant coaches, scouts and staffers who changed with the leaves of New England, has managed to keep this team VERY competitive for over a decade!

    So I ask who is the moron? A real fan who has spent hours watching this team in the good and bad seasons or a PI who makes blanket statements about a fan base that has seen this team through the thick and thin of what is the New England Patriots?

    Give the man and the team a break. They made one pick last night and added a 2nd rounder this year and traded first rounders to get it. I understand that they missed out on Matthews last year. they also avoided Gholston too. They will address their needs and I bet they do it tonight with their FIVE picks in the 2nd and 3rd rounds! You do not get that many picks by just making your picks. You sacrifice a pick or two to get more…getting more picks in the early rounds=more impact players.

    I for one am looking forward to what they do in the next few hours. Even if they trade down and disappoint those of you looking for the ” sexy picks”.

    IN BILL I TRUST!

  • http://ow.ly/7m6kL Travis Estevane

    How Crazy! I am so estatic. Just now I won a Canon EOS Rebel T1i camera for only $5.62 off this auction url here http://tinyurl.com/72t4ul3 . Christmas came early! I never ever had this much luck like today. I normally don’t have any luck. So shocked!

  • http://www.nikemercurialvaporsoccer.com/ nike soccer cleats

    I am going to clearly up-date the blogging site as quickly as possible. I’ve a lot of specific data about your subject! With biggest thanks!

  • http://papijump.org/tag/papijump-online-free/ papijump

    Very great post. I simply stumbled upon your weblog and wished to say that I have truly enjoyed surfing around your weblog posts. In any case I’ll be subscribing on your feed and I am hoping you write once more soon!

  • http://www.genuinepandorashopuk.net pandora jewellery uk

    I do agree with all of the ideas you have offered for your post. They’re really convincing and can certainly work. Still, the posts are too short for starters. May you please prolong them a little from next time? Thanks for the post.

  • http://www.antiagingsupplementmalaysia.com/Benefits-Collagen-Supplement.html anti aging supplement

    Generally I don’t read post on blogs, however I would like to say that this write-up very pressured me to try and do it! Your writing style has been amazed me. Thank you, quite great article.

  • http://www.magnum4d.blogspot.com/ magnum 4d

    Tremendous things here. I am very glad to look your post. Thanks so much and I’m having a look forward to contact you. Will you please drop me a e-mail?

  • http://www.nikemercurialsuperflys.com/ mercurial superfly

    It’s extraordinarily enjoyable for me to scan the articles.I appreciate you for it. I the same as such content and would the same as to browse extra soon.

  • http://www.bordenoutdoor.com/ tree removal

    Well.. nu am chef sa ma cert sau treburi. in primul rand (off topic), twilight este foarte tare pentru unii, foarte proasta pt altii. Hai sa nu ne dam cu parerea, pt ca nu este deschis topicul pt a posta argumente si contraargumente ale subiectului controversat amintit mai sus.si doi, sunt 6 carti ale seriei otherworld [bitten, stolen, dime store magic, industrial magic, haunted si broken ] si inca 3 ale otherworld 2 [ savage, ascension si beginnings]. Vestea buna e ca le am pe toate. Vestea proasta pt unii ca le am doar in engleza.

  • Bruinman86

    Great win despite a stupid penalty by Lucic.

  • Titletown1

    Bourque’s kid has to go. Sorry, he’s just not that good, period. I can’t understand how a guy that mediocre gets to play the point on the power play. Baffling.

    Neely needs to call Ray and tell him that his kid got a shot after seven years in the minors and he just can’t cut it, at least not in Boston.  

  • Fab4ever

    And to the poster who thinks the B’s need “no fixing”, the power play continues to be a burden. It’s pathetic….they keep winning, that’s what goes good for the B’s….but at some point, the brass will address this Achilles Heel by the deadline….an effective power play will make this team almost unstoppable….Is this team fun to watch?

  • Sicko

     Yeah, tough penalty considering, at best, he’s going to be called for a hand pass anyway and at worst what happened. Just blows my mind how dominant the Bruins have been and how few power play opportunities they get. Every night they play, I check the box and their opponent always seems to have twice as many chances on the pp. I know they have been atrocious with the man advantage but I would still like the penalties to be fair for both sides.

  • Chris Nilan

    I feel 10 times stupider after reading this comment by Sicko.
    May God have mercy on your soul.

  • Titletown1

    The B’s NOT having power plays is a good thing. They get more shots when they’re shorthanded.

  • Sicko

     Yeah okay douch e.

  • Fab4ever

    They need to fix the power play….regardless of the penalty ratio….I keep reading and listening to all the theories but it’s the same old same old….I realize no team is perfect but they can certainly use help in that regard…

  • Sicko

     I agree 100% my only point is they seem to take a lot of penalties even with the dominant record. The power play has been a killer ever since Savard went down.

  • Sicko

    Strange but seems to be true. The power play is just hard to watch. I would like them to go out and get someone that can score down low. IMHO they rely too much on the points on the power plays. Chara has an absolute gun for a shot but how many times does he ever score from the point?

  • Fab4ever

    They have cap space…there will be a move to improve…count on it.

  • NYCBruinsFan

    A nail biter tonight.  Wish the B’s had won in regualtion and not afforded the Senators a point, however we’ll take the two.  Awesome hit by Thorton which rocked the Garden.  As ususal Tuukka rules, and should have had the shutout tonight.  If only they could have pushed the puck to the corner…. 

  • NYCBruinsFan

    Despite always seeming like the Bruins are killing off a penalty, if you check the stats, we actually have one of the lower total PIM for the season so far.  It’s just too bad they all come at the worst possible time.  And yes, I too am also starting to become a little inpatinet waiting for the power play to improve. 

  • Sicko

     Yeah, but if you also notice they are the lowest team in the league for getting power plays at 51(next closest is 61). I know they have played a couple of fewer games but having one of the better teams in the league you would think they would get more pp time.

    As long as they keep winning I could care less but it always seems they are killing off late penalties in close games.

  • Sicko

     Next closest is actually 57, my mistake.

  • Bruinman86

     What gets me is the lack of finishing when given great opportunities.  They are averaging 3 goals a game. As for the penalties, the league has started to take the NBA approach to calling games. Some odd calls and many missed ones.  I hope this means the refs haven’t hit their stride yet…..

  • Bruinman86

     Well knuckles, he does have a point.  That hand on puck is often only called for a hand pass.  Especially this late in a tied game when Refs often don’t have the stones to call a potentially game winning PP.  In my opinion, it should always be a penalty, but the refs aren’t consistent enough about it.

  • Bruinman86

     and in many cases, more goals! One of the great wonders of the world – how can a team with such offensive skill suck so bad on the PP???

  • 6738730

    PP is definitely a concern.  The Bruins for the most part are playing with some swagger, but you can see that disappear as soon as they go a man up.  Almost as if they are too consumed with it.  I have read all sorts of suggestions and ideas, but one thing I know for sure, Chris Bourque does not belong on the point or on the ice in any PP scenario.  

  • Fab4ever

    “Chris Bourque does not belong on the point or on the ice in any PP scenario.”…which again proves my point…they need help on the power play and judging from history, this team will make some changes come trade deadline….

  • Titletown1

    I understand that the B’s have cap space but that is no guarantee that the Jacobs will spend the money. It’s a gamble for them; short season, less profit…..

  • Fab4ever

    Good point…however, from what I’ve read and heard, they’ll make a move…maybe just one…without having to spend the entire nut….and like you alluded, the Jacobs are all about $$ and the deeper this team goes in the playoffs, the more $$ they make….concessions etc…it’s a gamble for them but one I’m betting he’s willing to take….

  • Anonymous

    Solid win, however Bruins are clearly more talented than Ottawa and should have put that team down before they got a point for the OT. Bruins still for whatever reason play better on the road. 

    The PP, well we have been saying it for years and nothing has changed. There is no movement, no hustle, no sense of urgency to score on the PP. They continue to mystify me by changing the entire team philosophy for the PP’s.  

    I say, the best short term fix is to simplify things. Keep the Krejci line together, keep the Bergeron line together and keep the d pairings them same. Stop mixing and matching lines for the PP and putting forwards on the point. Tell them to play like it’s 5 on 5 and still use the cycle and normal forechecking to get this PP going. They go from being a grind it out hard forechecking team, to this pass happy, everyone standing still PP, it makes no sense. 

    I played against Chris Bourque when he was at Cushing Academy, yes at that point in his career he was lethal from the point on the powerplay. However, he just doesn’t have it at the NHL level. 
    For that matter, there are very few forwards in the NHL I would put on the point over any of the current bruins defensemen. None of those forwards are currently on the Bruins, one of them just so happens to be Jerome Iginla. 

  • Titletown1

    Amen. I believe that the B’s could acquire Iginla and I think he’d be a great fit.

Latest on Twitter

2013 PATRIOTS DRAFT PICKS

2013 NFL DRAFT

Patriots Headlines
NFL Headlines
Tips & Feedback

Verify