It Is What It Is
NEED TO KNOW
Follow WEEI.com football writer Christopher Price at twitter.com/cpriceNFL. In addition, get the latest WEEI.com updates at twitter.com/WEEI.
A WEEI.com Patriots Blog
WEEI.com Blog Network

Myth-busting the Patriots-Ravens matchup

01.18.12 at 7:55 am ET
By
Bill Belichick is a win away from his fifth Super Bowl as head coach. (AP)

Bill Belichick is a win away from his fifth Super Bowl as Patriots coach. (AP)

One man’s attempt to debunk three myths (was going to be five, but no Wikipedia makes that kind of heavy mental lifting impossible) that have been posing as storylines this week …

1. A team with zero quality wins can’t make the Super Bowl

You really want to do this? OK, the Patriots did not beat a team with a winning record during the regular season. Absolutely accurate. And they have not defeated a team with a winning record during this postseason. Also true. But does it really matter? The Patriots have eight wins over teams that finished 8-8 this season (Denver twice, Oakland, San Diego, Jets twice, Philadelphia, Dallas). A festival of triumph over mediocrity. Does that tell you more or less about a team than, say, five wins over 9-7 teams or three wins over 10-6 teams? Who the hell knows? Also this: If the Patriots had lost just once to one of these teams this would be a non-issue. Would they be better off with a 12-4 record if it meant the Raiders were 9-7? Would that make you more confident 10 minutes before kickoff on Sunday? Sure, it would have meant playing in Baltimore instead of Foxboro, but who could pass up the chance to claim a win over a 9-7 team, right?

Look, this hasn’t been a killer schedule. Not even close. And the Patriots have lost to the two best teams they played this season (Steelers and Giants). That’s a fair criticism. But if it’s third-and-7 for the Patriots with 4:36 left in the fourth quarter of a 24-21 game on Sunday I really don’t think the fact that the Ravens beat the 9-7 Bengals three weeks ago is going to play a factor in the odds of Tom Brady successfully completing a pass to Rob Gronkowski.

2. The Patriots have a resiliency that didn’t exist in 2009 or 2010

This is a completely media-created angle. There was no one — not a single person — questioning the mental toughness of this team before the Jets game last January. In fact, we were reading and hearing and feeling just the opposite– the Pats got rid of Randy Moss and were winning with “character guys” like Deion Branch, Danny Woodhead, BenJarvus Green-Ellis and Alge Crumpler. Here’s how it works: About two weeks ago the media — sick of trying to figure to define this defense, sick of writing, “We need to wait until the playoffs to find out what this team is” stories, sick of being stonewalled by Bill Belichick and the players day after day — figured a couple of comebacks against the Dolphins and Bills was evidence enough to declare that this team was different than the previous two playoff losers, that there were intangibles involved with this group that had been missing in 2009 and 2010. And guess what? If you ask the players what makes them mentally tough, they’ll probably give you a decent answer for a change. I don’t know. Brady threw a killer pick in the Jets loss, Crumpler had dropped a pass in the end zone and was beaten by Calvin Pace on a third-quarter sack and forced fumble of Brady and Jerod Mayo whiffed on Jerricho Cotchery‘s key 58-yard catch on the first play the fourth quarter. Anyone ever question the mental toughness of those three guys?

It’s all about personnel and making plays. If the Patriots win on Sunday it will because they made more plays than the Ravens. Oh, and win the turnover battle. That’s it, and everything else is mythology, plain and simple. I’m sure, for example, that every player and coach in the New England locker room care gently and would like to win the Super Bowl for Bob Kraft, given the year he’s had. But I reject the idea that the memory of Myra Kraft will suddenly help Danny Woodhead block a blitzing Ray Lewis on Sunday. It just doesn’t work that way. It strikes me that Lewis seems to give the same speech to that defense before every Ravens game, we always see CBS cut to it and treat it like it’s the announcement of The Truman Doctrine. Well, sometimes they win and sometimes they lose, so what does those words really mean? Nothing.

3. Being on the road means nothing to this Ravens team

You’ll hear this from the national media this week, almost certainly from Jim Nantz and Phil Simms (who is having a dreadful postseason, has he always been this confused?) and the five guys screaming at each other during the pregame show on NFL Network (unspeakably awful, who sits down and watches this stuff week after week?). The Ravens have a veteran group, they’ve been in a million NFL wars, playoffs wins on the road, no situation is going to scare them, all that stuff. And of course some of that is true, I suspect the red-seaters at Gillette (hey, you try cheering with brie stuffed in your mouth) aren’t going to terrify Lewis, Suggs and the rest.

“Intimidating? I don’t know. You never really stand on the field and look in the stands with big eyes and freak out, you know what I mean? There are places that are louder than others.”

That was Jarret Johnson on Monday, and that pretty much sums up Gillette Stadium. It’s never going to be the Boston Garden circa 1986 in terms of noise, but I’m not sure that matters when you look at this: Since that playoff loss in January 2010, the Patriots are 16-2 at home and the Ravens are 10-9 on the road. The Ravens split their eight road games this year (all four losses to non-playoff teams). And over the last two seasons the Ravens are 16-1 at home. Experience is swell and important and never hurts, but the Ravens have been terrific at home and a .500 team on the road over the last two years.

Read More: Bill Belichick, Ray Lewis, Tom Brady, Print  |  Bark It Up!  |  Digg It
  • guest

    Not to try to make the Patriots schedule seem more difficult than it was, it is worth noting when they played some of these 8-8 teams, they had winning records (Chargers, Raiders, Jets once, Broncos technically twice).

    • Dittoheadadt

      That’s exactly right. What matters is NOT whether a team had a winning record at the end of the season, what matters is whether the team had a winning record AT THE TIME the Patriots beat them.

  • Stiffler30

    If they lost to the raiders, than yes, the raiders would have in fact been 9-7, but we still wouldn;t have beaten a team over .500. What an idiot.

    • Unbelievable

      LOL!!! D’OH!  

    • JT

      Change it to Jets or Broncos and the point stands. The concept is still valid.

    • http://pulse.yahoo.com/_F6N5SREYTEFYPZBIKGQ6YM5DBY AverageJoeEveryman

      thought the same exact thing when I read it

  • CTPatsFan

    Why the snark about our fans? I’ve been a season-ticket holder (300 level) since 1994. Kraft didn’t send me a questionnaire on acceptable stadium plans in 2001. They built a venue that’s quieter by design than the one it replaced. Combine this with a much heavier security/police presence, zero tolerance for rowdiness (bye-bye tickets,) and the most expensive seats in the NFL (bye-bye blue collars) it results in a volume drop. We yell, but it’s like Horton Hears a Who up there!

  • bobd

    Yeah, well, maybe their schedule wasn’t great. But I guarantee you they’re not going to be tested by the Ravens.  Did you see their game vs. Houston? The Texans wiped the field with those guys on both sides of the field. The Ravens are living on reputation only.

  • guest

    Congrats to the Pats for winning their first playoff game since the videotaping scandal. Guess Belicheat needed Josh back as his “video coordinator”.

    • Dittoheadadt

      I’m pretty sure they won a couple of playoff games to get to the Super Bowl game that they lost to the Giants…or did their 16-0 regular season record give them a “bye” straight into the Super Bowl??

    • JDmn

      No doubt another bitter Jets fan.

    • Moo

      At least the president & VP of the pats wasn’t on the rules committee, kinda Bill Polian was all those years. Ever wonder why defense is dead in the NFL today?? Who needs a video editor when you can just change the rules of the game every year until your teams wins… isn’t that right, Colts fan?!?!

    • Bhdyer20

      Really?  The scandal broke before the 2007 season pretty sure they won a playoff game or two that year because fairly certain they were in the Super Bowl.

  • VWF75

    Do you want to be at the game this Sunday? Well here’s your chance to be Vince Wilfork’s Guest at the AFC Championship game! Winner and a guest will receive 2 tickets to the AFC Championship game and ALL PRO Celebrity Tailgate Party Passes to a tailgate party hosted by WEEI’s Glenn Ordway, Fred Smerlas and Steve DeOssie. Raffle tickets are only $2.00, what do you have to lose?http://secure.celebritiesforcharity.org/raffle/vince-wilforks-afc-championship-game-raffle

  • Kern

    Point two is off in my opinion. No one questioned mental toughness doesn’t translate into there was mental toughness. In 2009 Brady was shaky mentally (period), Welker going down against the Texans was emotionally deflating and the Patriots could barely win on the road (blowout by the Saints, anyone?). In 2010 the team was front-running; they were executing well on offense, but they were never really challenged until the Jets in the post-season; looking past the Jets resulted in a one-and-done game filled with mental lapses.

    It started this year with 4 turnovers to the Bills at their place and only loosing by a late game field-goal. From then it was evident that the team had this intangible urgency about them. 

    Finally, playing for something greater than self does/will impose a single directed focus and purpose that literally translates into more hustle, more heart. Yeah….I CAN’T let Mr. Kraft down can give Woodhead the alacrity to go up against Lewis, here’s the kicker, the O-line, the QB and the receivers are playing with that alacrity as well. It may not work all the time, but it probably will work enough of the time to effect a real difference in the game’s outcome.

    It’s not the fault of the cynic that he doesn’t understand sacrifice…. 

  • RobDX

    Disagree on point 2, media is saying that because Wilfork said it himself, that the team is different, more mentally solid and mature.

  • Toro5050

    Thanks for pointing that out stiffyhead

  • Doc

    I seem to recall Woodhead took out a blitzing Lewis last year….just sayin’

  • Hedgehogchrist

    Keep stroking, you’ll get there.

Latest on Twitter

2013 PATRIOTS DRAFT PICKS

2013 NFL DRAFT

Patriots Headlines
NFL Headlines
Tips & Feedback

Verify