It Is What It Is
NEED TO KNOW
Follow WEEI.com football writer Christopher Price at twitter.com/cpriceNFL. In addition, get the latest WEEI.com updates at twitter.com/WEEI.
A WEEI.com Patriots Blog
WEEI.com Blog Network
Bill Belichick breaks down one of the great defenses of all time 10.19.12 at 8:11 pm ET
By

Buddy Ryan was the toast of the NFL when he created the '46' defense for the Bears. (AP)

FOXBORO — Bill Belichick went into his teaching mode Friday and offered a PhD-worthy five-minute breakdown of one of the great defenses in history – the ’46′ Bears defense of Buddy Ryan, who starred as defensive coordinator of the Bears in the mid-80s before moving on to his job as head coach of the Eagles.

What was particularly fascinating was Belichick breaking down when the blitzing scheme worked – and when it didn’t. In short, the defense was designed to stop two-back offenses while one-back sets with two tight ends were very successful.

“A lot of the success that Buddy had with the 46 defense came in the ‘80s when there was a lot of two-back offense,” Belichick began. “It was one of the things that probably drove the two-back offense out. If you remember back in the ‘80s when Buddy was in Philadelphia, he had a lot of trouble with the Redskins and their one-back offense, a lot of trouble. There were a lot of mismatches of Art Monk and Gary Clark on the middle linebacker and stuff like that. I think the 46 was really originally built for two-back offenses, whether it be the red, brown, blue and the flat-back type offenses and eventually even the I-formation. I think it still has a lot of good application; a lot of teams use it in goal-line situations.”

In fact, those Redskins teams of the late-80s and early-90s won a pair of Super Bowls, going through Buddy Ryan’s Eagles in the NFC East on their way to beating the Broncos and Bills, respectively.

Belichick also got an up close and personal look at those Ryan defenses when the Giants had their wars with the Bears and, later, the Eagles in the NFC East.

“They either use a version of it like a 5-3 or cover the guards and the center and however you want to fit the rest of it, but that principle you see a lot in goal-line, short yardage situations,” Belichick said. “You see it and some teams have it as part of their two-back defensive package. As it has gone to one-back and it’s gotten more spread out, if you’re playing that, it kind of forces you defensively to be in a one-linebacker set. You lose that second linebacker and depending on where the back lines up and what coverage you’re playing, then there’s some issues with that. If you’re in a one linebacker defense and you move the back over and the linebacker moves over then you’re kind of out-leveraged to the back side. If you don’t move him over, then you’re kind of out-leveraged when the back releases and that kind of thing.

“There are some issues there that, I’m not saying you can’t do it, but you have to work them out. In a two-back set, I’d say it was probably a lot cleaner and it always gave you an extra blitzer that was hard for the offense. Even if they seven-man protected on play-action, there was always an eighth guy there somewhere. You didn’t have to bring all eight; if you just brought the right one and they didn’t have him or somebody would have to have two guys and that creates some problems. I think that’s what Buddy really, where the genius of that was; he had by formation a different combination and group of blitzes so depending on what formation you were in, then he ran a blitz that would attack that formation and then when you changed formations, then he would change blitzes. Now, plus the fact [he] had Dan Hampton, Richard Dent, Mike Singletary, [Otis] Wilson, [Wilbur] Marshall, that was a pretty good group there. You could have probably played a lot of things and that defense would have looked pretty good, especially when they put Hampton on the nose. That was pretty unblockable.”

Read More: Bill Belichick, Buddy Ryan, Chicago Bears, Dan Hampton Print  |  Bark It Up!  |  Digg It
  • Anonymous

    Just got to say go Jeff Green!
    Way to steal one C’s.
    Sign of a good team that they don’t quit, they find a way to win.

  • Clutch

    No Granger but key win. Closed one out when they played behind all game.

  • Succinct

    ggggggggggggguuuuuuuuuuuuttttttttsssssssssssssyyyyyyyyyyyyyyyyyyyyyy………………..

  • Bruinman86

    Great win.  Nice to see the C’s actually play well at the end of a close game.

  • Fab4ever

    And if the playoffs started today, they’d be playing the Pacers…..too bad they lost Sully….I’m still scratching my head about Rondo….I don’t know what to make of him….this team is not sucking….

  • Keebs

    Good comeback win & one hell of a play drawn up by Doc. I’m glad it wasn’t the typical pull up jumper at the buzzer. 

  • ken

    This team is building confidence down the stretch, all NBA defense AB, 6th man J. Green

  • Bruinman86

    I’m fine with trading him for another talented player with star potential or giving Danny a high draft pick to work with.

  • Rob Clarkin

     What_A_Win :: Rajon ….Houdini ? I like this team, as currently configured, WAY MORE – -  would love to have, particularly, a healthy Sullinger . . . but folks, the sample is becoming a pattern is becoming an axiom of team chemistry * * * *

  • ChrisinDanvers

    Solid win. The team stayed closed for the most part, tightened the defense in the fourth quarter, and got the Pacers into playing away from their strengths….on the second night of a back to back no  less. Shows a lot about this team. And, it was great to see a last second play work that did not involve Rajon Rondo or Paul Pierce putting up the shot.

    They are playing stronger right now…at the right time.

  • Uncle Buck

    I tuned in with 7 minutes left in the 4th quarter.  I watched because it was on DVR and I could zip past time outs and ads.  5 minutes left and down by 9 points, on the road, part two of a back to back, against a good team……wow.  Very impressive.

  • Anonymous

    similar feeling to last year with no one giving them a chance to make some noise in the playoffs.  with the exception of miami, i’d take them in a 7 game series against anyone in the east right now.  vets and doc have the whole team believing in themselves.  fun team to watch.  they bring it every night.

  • Ty

    Well you hit on something big there at the end–the team isn’t that bad even without Rondo or Sully.  There are a couple reasons for this, one being that the Celtics are a lot deeper than they were given credit for when they were struggling.  With a couple players hurt, it gives players like Green and Terry more opportunity to showcase their talent, whereas before, it wasn’t necessarily happening as much for them because there were other options at Doc’s disposal.

    Without Rondo, the assists are distributed much more evenly throughout the roster every game, making everyone more involved and not revolving around one player as much.  It’s about as good as if Rondo has one of his better games, but the perimeter defense is also improved, which showed in those 3 pt. shooting stats for Indiana last night.  If they can execute at the end of games like they did last night, they won’t miss Rondo’s play-making abilities that he creates at the end of games that much either.

Latest on Twitter

2013 PATRIOTS DRAFT PICKS

2013 NFL DRAFT

Patriots Headlines
NFL Headlines
Tips & Feedback

Verify