It Is What It Is
NEED TO KNOW
Follow WEEI.com football writer Christopher Price at twitter.com/cpriceNFL. In addition, get the latest WEEI.com updates at twitter.com/WEEI.
A WEEI.com Patriots Blog
WEEI.com Blog Network
What NFL history says about (un)importance of Nos. 3 and 4 playoff seeds 12.18.12 at 3:22 pm ET
By
Perhaps the Patriots will want to take a page from Doug Flutie and the 2005 team and dropkick their way to the No. 4 AFC seed again. (AP)

Perhaps the Patriots will want to take a page from Doug Flutie and the 2005 team and dropkick their way to the No. 4 AFC seed again. (AP)

With their loss to the 49ers on Sunday night, the Patriots slipped from the No. 2 to No. 3 seed in the AFC, a setback with obviously considerable implications. New England would have to win an additional playoff game to reach the Super Bowl, and the team would then have to win a road game in the divisional round in order to advance to the AFC championship game with a Super Bowl berth on the line.

WEEI.com’s Christopher Price argues that, given the likelihood that the Pats can’t overtake the Broncos (who play a couple of easy marks in the last two weeks of the season), New England would be well served to lose its way down to the No. 4 seed in the playoffs.

But what does history say? Have teams with the No. 3 seed done any better than those with the No. 4 seed? For that matter, how big is the difference in the second and third seeds in terms of the likelihood of emerging from a conference and reaching the Super Bowl?

Here’s a look at the seeds of the 44 teams to reach the Super Bowl since 1990, when the NFL went to a 12-team playoff format:

No. 1 seeds – 21 reached Super Bowl, 9 won

No. 2 seeds – 12 reached Super Bowl, 6 won

No. 3 seeds – 2 reached Super Bowl, 1 won

No. 4 seeds – 6 reached Super Bowl, 3 won

No. 5 seeds – 1 reached Super Bowl, 1 won

No. 6 seeds – 2 reached Super Bowl, 2 won

As one might expect, the No. 1 seeds have been the most frequent conference representatives in the Super Bowl, emerging almost one out of every two times (47.7 percent). And, as might also be expected, the No. 2 seed is the second most frequently represented, an unsurprising development given the opportunity to host a divisional playoff game and, in years where the No. 1 seed gets upset, the AFC championship game as well.

But beyond the top two seeds, the No. 4 seed has advanced to the Super Bowl with far greater frequency than the No. 3 seed. That doesn’t mean that there’s particular benefit to being the No. 4 seed as compared to the No. 3 seed, per se — but, at the least, it’s hard to make the case for the intrinsic value of being the No. 3 or No. 4 seed.

Teams that win their divisions get to host home playoff games in the wild card round. After that, it’s a crapshoot. In other words, if the Patriots don’t think that they have a realistic chance of catching the Broncos or Texans in the remaining two weeks of the season, then they have little incentive to play to win — particularly if they believe, as in 2005, that they could have a more favorable series of matchups if they lose one or both of their remaining games.

Print  |  Bark It Up!  |  Digg It
  • Brian

    If Alex Speier starts covering football too I’ll be extremely happy.  The only writer in Boston who brings objective analysis to his articles.  The whole Boston media is reactionary and drives narratives (*cough* Minihane *cough*) instead of analyzing things beyond the surface level, it’s like everyone is on ESPN First Take and just trying to get attention and relate to Joe Simple Fan.  Everyone is overly critical, because when you stick with forcing narratives it’s tough to be optimistic, you sound like a suck up, so everyone is overly critical to make up for their lack of basic knowledge.

  • Mark Foster

    lose their way to 4? do you think for one nano sec bill is going to have his team think about losing a game down the stretch?

  • Paul

    Maybe a better answer would be to allow the top seed to pick their opponent. In the wild card round the 3 seed could choose which match up it wants. Then the next round the #1 seed would pick who they want to play. It would give even more incentive to play for the win, after securing a playoff birth

  • Anonymous

    The AFC Championship game was a home game for the #3 seed in 2006.    The #4 had to go visit them and lost.  Anyone remember who the #4 was?    Given that history.  Belichick is never going risk having to go to Baltimore for a playoff game (no matter how remote that may look) if at all possible.   

    I think the reason that the #4 has done better historically is because those are often teams that under perform early in the season and then get hot down to the stretch – like the New York Giants last year – and just continue riding that streak into the postseason.   That’s something that can’t be replicated by throwing the remaining two games.

  • Raghu M

    Peyton has not played a playoff game for & in Denver in January. So, is he really a threat for Pats? I think the home field advantage of playing Peyton in Denver is nullified due to this reason and Pats will have a good shot if and when we play in Denver in the Divisional Round. 

Latest on Twitter

2013 PATRIOTS DRAFT PICKS

2013 NFL DRAFT

Patriots Headlines
NFL Headlines
Tips & Feedback

Verify