It Is What It Is
NEED TO KNOW
Follow WEEI.com football writer Christopher Price at twitter.com/cpriceNFL. In addition, get the latest WEEI.com updates at twitter.com/WEEI.
A WEEI.com Patriots Blog
WEEI.com Blog Network
NFL owners vote to abolish tuck rule 03.20.13 at 1:22 pm ET
By
The Patriots benefited from the "Tuck Rule" in the 2001 playoffs against the Raiders. (AP)

The Patriots benefited from the tuck rule in the 2001 playoffs against the Raiders. (AP)

The NFL voted to abolish the tuck rule on Wednesday at the league meetings, with the clubs voting 29-1 to do away with the rule that helped play a role in the Patriots’ amazing run to the Super Bowl at the end of the 2001 season.

Twenty-nine teams voted to eliminate the rule. Only Pittsburgh voted to keep it on the books, with the Patriots and Redskins abstaining. The change means that when a quarterback tries to bring the ball back to his body after deciding not to throw and loses the handle, it will be a fumble and not an incomplete pass. If a passer loses control while the ball is going forward, it’s still incomplete.

New England benefited from the tuck rule in the 2001 divisional playoffs against the Raiders when a late fumble call was overturned and called an incomplete pass. That decision helped spur a late comeback by the Patriots, who would go on to win Super Bowl XXXVI later that year.

Patriots owner Robert Kraft — who said he has a picture of the play with an autograph from former Raiders coach Jon Gruden — joked earlier in the week about the possibility of doing away with the rule, and adding that he  might have to abstain from the vote for sentimental reasons.

“I never heard of the tuck rule before the snow game. I love the tuck rule, and forever will,” he said.

The owners also voted to institute a rule that would ban players from leading with the crown of their helmets when outside the tackle box.

For more Patriots news, check out weei.com/patriots.

Read More: Robert Kraft, Tom Brady, Tuck Rule, Print  |  Bark It Up!  |  Digg It
  • ih8sno

    We got us some!

  • Ty

    Definitely not shocked the tuck rule was abolished, but I am a little bit surprised that the owners voted for that rule against leading with the crown of the helmet when outside the tackle box. I hate to see even more flags being thrown on something that’s going to be so subjective, but I suppose it will help prevent concussions. Here’s the problem though–and again, this goes back to how subjective this rule is going to be–how do you interpret when someone is leading with their helmet as a weapon and when they have lowered their head as a self-defense type of mechanism to brace for the incoming tackler? I have a feeling I’m going to hate this rule, as I think guys will be penalized for instinctively defending themselves.

  • fab4ever

    Let the Haters begin their crying. It was simply “the correct interpretation of a bad rule”…Funny how Karma works…Raider fans were the beneficiary of an awful call against Sugar Bear Hamilton but lost here….in the end, I’d say we’re even…

  • Bruinman86

    Do something about Pass Interference and I’ll be impressed.

  • boring media hype

    Oakland had plenty of opportunity to stop the Patriots after that play and failed….nuff said!

  • wmeritz

    Good point! In the end the rules committee has managed to complicate the officiating of a very simple game. They should do something about fumbles too. The idea that the ground cannot cause a fumble should be eliminated too. The games because of instant replay and play stoppages has become too long.

Latest on Twitter

2013 PATRIOTS DRAFT PICKS

2013 NFL DRAFT

Patriots Headlines
NFL Headlines
Tips & Feedback

Verify